Homosexuality should be killed in Uganda. There is a difference, big difference between an homosexual and homosexuality! An homosexual is a living though perverted, breathing human; homosexuality is a lifestyle. So when I say kill homosexuality, it means I am saying kill the lifestyle.
This of course can be done variously. The actions of killing homosexuality, which can be various, if carried out, should be detached from what I am advocating for. To be precise, in my understanding of killing homosexuality, killing homosexuality should be conducted in form of community education. This means each and every Ugandan community must embark on teaching all their youth of the contradictions homosexuality presence vis-a-vis our cultures and cultural norms; including its attendant pervertedness and lowly lifestyle. Once youths are taught of and religiously guided to never ever embrace the lifestyle, homosexuality shall be dead and buried. Period. There would be no any other way.
Further, the state must also take a stand on homosexuality and outlaw it. This is because we do have our cultures that don’t condone, promote, or even practice homosexuality so why employ a state of confusion and helplessness to deal with the strange behaviour?
The history of our cultures is never tainted with homosexuality; there are no proven records anywhere that men and human used to practice homosexual lifestyle. Claiming that homosexuality is genetic is going too far. Have you ever come across homosexuals in the many boarding schools that dot the country? NO! Not when I was a student in one of those schools. If homosexuality is genetic predisposition, then it means in the many secondary and post-secondary schools in the country, we should have had homosexuals going about practicing their homosexuality; absence of which disprove the theory.
So, Ugandans, homosexuality is a learn lifestyle; not genetic predisposition. Since it is a learn lifestyle, we hold every right to disallow our children from learning the lifestyle. It’s not within our cultural definitions. Therefore, yes, the lifestyle has to be killed.
Having said that, if others misinterpret the message and went ahead killed homosexuals, their cases should be judged purely independently. However, I would think that under such circumstances, our cultures must inform judgements of the judges, and if I were one of the judges, I would acquit such a person. End of story.
It is up to the populations to kill homosexuality quietly without making too much noise about it. There are homosexuals out there who are working to plant it in the populations, given what you are bringing forth, but if the populations kills it out every time it pops its head, there would be no options.
