What does the law say on land evictions in Uganda


Dear UAH,

As you are aware there are four complicated forms of landownership in Uganda unlike in developed nations which reduced to only two, namely, freehold, leasehold. In Uganda we have the former plus two , that is,  mailo and customary. Given the change of circumstances the latter, that is, mailo and customary are likely to be absorbed into the former, that is, freehold(mailo likely to take this form) and  leashold. There are number of pieces of legislations regulating land ownership Uganda. However, the most essential pieces are (a) Land Act 1998 (Ch 227), (b) Land Acquistion Act 1965(Ch 226) and (c) Registration of Titles Act 1924(Ch 230).

As regards the issue of recent so called ‘ Mengo evictions’, it first and foremost depends on how the deprived parties obtained  that land; were they granted  (a)leasehold?  Or b) freehold(?). If any of those, did they bother to register their titles?  Or Is it so that the land in question  was obtained fraudulently? If you are granted either  a  freehold or leasehold, you can’t just be evicted abrutly without an advance notice. The notice can be served to you provided you breach the covenant(e.g failure to pay rent)   between you and your landlord (previous land lord if bought freehold). However though served a notice to vacate, the landlord must seek a court order to lawfully evict you.  Most land disputes are handled by land tibunals, but if  unsuccessful at the tribual level,then the high court, a court which also deals with emergency situations which may require the deprived party to seek an injunction.  So I don’t know well whether the Mengo victims were lawfull freeholders or leaseholders and what exactly transpired.  Did they, for instance, acquire the land fraudulently or just breached the covenant with their landlord(the Kabaka)?

The following section is a good authority on eviction of tenants:

PART XII—ACTIONS AND OTHER REMEDIES   S.176  Registration of Titles Act 1924(Ch 230)

176. Registered proprietor protected against ejectment except in certain
cases.
No action of ejectment or other action for the recovery of any land shall lie or be sustained against the person registered as proprietor under this Act, except in any of the following cases—
the case of a mortgagee as against a mortgagor in default;
the case of a lessor as against a lessee in default;
the case of a person deprived of any land by fraud as against the person registered as proprietor of that land through fraud or as vb against a person deriving otherwise than as a transferee bona fide for value from or through a person so registered through fraud;
the case of a person deprived of or claiming any land included in any certificate of title of other land by misdescription of the other land or of its boundaries as against the registered proprietor of that other land not being a transferee of the land bona fide for value;
the case of a registered proprietor claiming under a certificate of title prior in date of registration under this Act in any case in which two or more certificates of title may be registered under this Act in respect of the same land,
and in any case other than as aforesaid the production of the registered certificate of title or lease shall be held in every court to be an absolute bar and estoppel to any such action against the person named in that document as the grantee, owner, proprietor or lessee of the land described in it, any rule of law or equity to the contrary notwithstanding

The best thing to do at the moment is perhaps to enact a new piece of legislation which require compulsory registration of titles(perhap computerised?), just to curb the increase of fraud involved in acquiring land titles in Uganda and regulation of relationships) between the landlord(s) and tenant(s).  England and Wales have very formidable pieces of  legislation, that is, Land Registration Act 2002 and Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996, which address those problems decently.

Comments

9 Comments so far. Leave a comment below.
  1. Jacob Mutabazi,

    Read this story.

    http://allafrica.com/stories/200905220080.html

    Jacob Mutabazi

  2. Jacob Mutabazi,

    The royal family can be part of this fraudently transfer of titles. The landlord in this case is Queen lady Damali Kisosonkole og Buganda.

    This case file is Civil suit 54 of 2009 at Nakawa High Court of Uganda.

  3. kisekka rajab,

    its a good paper

  4. Jacob Mutabazi,

    Justice Monica Mugenyi has said that Jacob Mutabazi has failed to prove that his father paid bussulu. How does her mind work when she does not understand that when ones house is invended and is destroyed that evidence is also distroyed.

    His is our Uganda we think has moved forward from the times of Idi Amin.

  5. Jacob Mutabazi,

    Justice Monica Mugenyi puts the instrument of death in the hands of landlords. She writes in her judgement of Jacob Mutabazi verses The Seventh Day Adventist Church and Dan Namaswala;
    “Mwambali, from whom the plaintiff derives title, died in 1974 and ceased occupation thereof.” This means to you all Ugandans that the landlords can just kill because the land reverts to the landlords. This is why Mwambali and his brother (my uncle) both died at the hands of the Royal family (The Kisosonkoles.

  6. Jacob,

    Worning. The Uganda Land Registry is now using Empirisk and Metric systems to confuse and forge land titles. For example writing 2 acres as 1.620 hectors.

  7. Aziz,

    What would be the position of Asian evictees who held land before the Idi Amin exodus?Can they still claim back their land through a legal proceeding?

  8. Jacob Mutabazi,

    Why not if they were Ugandans and they kan prove to have been tenants of the landlords. Do not look at race but people of blood and flesh. They were only mislead by the colonial masters to think they were British while they should have become Ugandans.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: