London conference discussed federalism in a tolerant atmosphere


The well publicized London federal conference organized by Uganda Federal Confederates (UFC) took place at the University of East London on October 27, 2012. The attendance could not have been better. A high powered delegation from Uganda joined others at the University including those from the United States of America.
All the four regions of northern, eastern, western and central (Buganda) and all demographic groups of men, women and youth were represented. Different organizations and political parties were also represented. United Democratic Ugandans (UDU) was represented by the Secretary General, Eric Kashambuzi who presented two papers on the Roadmap to Achieving Federalism in Uganda and plans to establish Tutsi Empire in the Great Lakes region.
The debate took place in a tolerant atmosphere under the leadership of the master of ceremony in which participants discussed a wide range of issues related to federalism versus unitarism freely and responsibly, disagreeing where they did in a civil manner. Decorum was exercise as required.

Presentations were followed by pertinent comments, questions and suggestions on the way forward. That the discussions were so engaging can be attested to by the fact that the master of ceremony had to set time limits for presentations and comments so that everyone had a chance to make a contribution. In the end according to my assessment the following observations emerged from the successful conference.

1. It was clear that a unitary system of government and its associated decentralization or tier system hasn’t worked in Uganda in large part because of absence of checks and balances or separation of powers. Power has remained concentrated at the center exercised by the office of the president and/or minister of local government to the extent that local authorities haven’t been able to develop, finance and implement programs according to their human and natural resources, culture and history. Consequently, poverty and deprivation have remained unacceptably high.

2. There was consensus that development is regional or location specific and internally generated and sustained.

3. For any model of governance to work be it unitary or federal it must be anchored on good governance including free and fair elections, transparency, participation and accountability.

4. There was consensus that there is no one single model for federalism and Uganda should craft one that suits her conditions and adjusted as the need arises.

5. Federalism was defined to mean sharing of power between central (federal) and local governments. Once the decision has been reached, the powers, duties and responsibilities of each should be incorporated into the constitution. It was noted that the current constitution will need to be amended to reflect the new developments.

6. Notwithstanding the Odoki Commission report and its findings on federalism which was published in 1992, there was agreement that those findings need to be updated to involve Ugandans that didn’t participate either because they were too young, in the diaspora or not yet born. This demand was reflected in statements and suggestions like a needs assessment, a roundtable, a task force and equal representation. UDU suggested that a task force be established on regional basis with each region represented by at least three people including a man, a woman and a youth. The Task Force should update the Odoki Commission findings and prepare action oriented recommendations as a basis for drawing a consensus on federalism and embark on a roadmap to achieve it.

7. The roadmap should include agreement on standard geographic units (regions, provinces or districts to avoid regional imbalance as in Nigeria); equal rights of all units; functions of federal and local governments; revenue collection and distribution and federal regulations and standards for local governments to follow, etc. It was stressed that a federal system doesn’t mean that local authorities can do whatever they like. They will be guided (and implement) at all times by federal and international norms and standards.

8. The organizers of the conference with support of selected participants should prepare follow-up action plan. UDU requested to be involved.

9. The conference thanked the organizers – Uganda Federal Confederates – for a job well done.

Eric Kashambuzi
Secretary General & Chief Administrator, UDU

Advertisements

Comments

3 Comments so far. Leave a comment below.
  1. Dr. Kiztor,

    Did you chaps totally forget to mention the future positions of the numerous Kings we now have in Uganda in a Federal Uganda or just ignored the matter as a mere bagatelle ????……Come back to me on that issue and I will point you to some intelligent analysis regarding this supposedly; “minor” issue.

  2. But why is that it is Buganda relentlessly agitating for federalism? Isn’t there reason for anyone to be suspicious of this push for Federalism by a region which is strategically located in as compared to other region?

    Secondly, can someone convince me that federalism will solve the problem of un-equal distribution of development and resources, drawing examples from at least 10 successful Countries in Africa using the federal system of Governance

    Short of that,like any other human being,I will have genuine reasons to be suspicious

  3. eresu john,

    While the conference might have been a success, it remains to be seen if these ‘big’ ideas will ever see the light of the day. The one thing as a Ugandan who has lived in Uganda independence and I have seen big ideas fronted by those who have chosen to live out of Uganda from the outside, It has come to be seen that these are just time passing conferences, just organised for some people to meet to know each other. In the first place clear knowledge about what Uganda is lacks, most of the information and data about Uganda are either distorted or simply outdated. The views of the participants are either imaginary or simply lacking and the participants are simply guessing what are the realities on the ground. So in most cases, the conferences are simply fan fair and a form of getting together so that business cards are exchanged.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: